Skip to content
Example. A monitored question, the answer an assistant actually gave, and how it was judged.

Understand and decide

How AI assistants describe your business

People increasingly ask an assistant before they search. What comes back about your business is either right, wrong, or nothing at all — and until now there was no way to know which. This measures it by asking, and keeps every answer it was given.

14-day evaluation · no card · start before you connect anything

What it counts, and how it counts it

Where this sits in the loop

Understand. It learns the business. It follows Improve and hands on to Decide.

How the answers assistants give about your business become work: your questions are asked on a schedule, each reply is kept as given, and what is wrong becomes a signal in the same queue as everything else.
  1. 1

    You define the questions that matter

    The universe is your questions, in the words a buyer would use — not a generic keyword list. What is measured is what somebody would actually type.

  2. 2

    Xyranik asks, and records the answer verbatim

    Each question is put to the assistants on a schedule, and the reply is stored as given. Every figure on the page traces back to an answer you can read, which is the difference between measurement and a score somebody invented.

  3. 3

    It reports presence, accuracy and absence separately

    Being named, being described correctly, and not appearing at all are three different problems with three different fixes, so they are never collapsed into one number.

What you can rely on

  • Answers you can read, not a score you must trust

    Every observation keeps the reply it came from. A visibility figure with no readable answer behind it is a claim, and this product exists because that claim is easy to make and impossible to check.

  • Findings become work

    Where an assistant describes the business wrongly, that becomes a signal in the same queue as everything else, so it can be acted on rather than noted.

  • Measured over time, on your own questions

    Repeated on a schedule, so a change is visible as a change rather than as a single reading. The comparison is against your own history, never an industry benchmark nobody can audit.

What it will not tell you

Figures this deliberately withholds, and what it would take to earn them.

  • It measures; it does not guarantee

    Nothing here promises to make an assistant say something. It tells you what is being said and where the gaps are; what you do about it is ordinary work on your own site and content.

  • Which assistants are asked is ours to decide

    The assistants used are an implementation detail and may change as the landscape does. What stays constant is that every answer shown was actually received.

See what it already knows about your business

The evaluation starts before you connect anything: Xyranik reads your own site into facts you can check and correct. What it cannot yet measure, it says so rather than filling in.